|Posted on November 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM|
It would be one thing if our closest neighbor was upset about us not mowing our lawn, but when it comes to Mexico, our southern friends have had it with our failed drug war and they want us to do something about it.
But like a good neighbor that doesn't want to stir things up, since they have to live next door to us, blunt criticism comes from their elder past leaders who don't have to live in a world of political niceties.
"This situation of being in between has brought in war here in Mexico, that we are, that I don't understand why did we assume this war. That war should be done only in the United States," says ex-President Vicente Fox about the position Mexico has had to endure -- and he's had it with not only us, but also our stale government's solutions.
With our unworkable prohibition stance, it's a troubling experience for the decades of generations caught between the cheap supply in southern countries and high paying consumption in the United States.
And while U.S. politicians debate the issue then go back to their safe, cushy existences at home, people in Mexico are being slaughtered. "It's extremely bad, it's extremely violent, it's extremely costly, it's extremely harmful, and more than anything it goes right against the hope of youth in Mexico," says Fox.
If crushing the hope of the youth of Mexico isn't enough, the money spent trying to combat the violence and stem the flow of drugs is crippling the Mexican economy, ensuring that those hopeless youths will also be saddled with an incredible amount of debt and bleak prospects when it comes to bringing their country back to life. "In the case of Mexico the budget is very limited," President Fox tells us, "so unfortunately every cent, every dollar that has been increased in this useless with no results war, is against the budgetary education of the project for promoting jobs or else. So, it's a war, but it's taking us nowhere, it's a war, but is totally useless, a total failure, like the war convoked by the United States in the government of President Nixon. 40 years has gone by, and entire war is also a total absolute failure."
Many in Mexico feel, and with good reason, that while most of the blame for prohibition violence belongs to the U.S. government and their policies, it's innocent people in Mexico who are made to pay the price. This is simply not fair, says President Fox. "This game is not even. Big change has to come about. But legalization becomes a strategic, social, positive and a real solution to the problem."
The U.S. government is not a fan of "big change" and usually has to be led kicking and screaming down the path of "incremental change." This is what happened last week with the recreational legalization victories for cannabis in Colorado and Washington. But how long can the people of Mexico continue to endure unprecedented levels of violence? Many south of the border simply will not survive our incremental changes.
But it doesn't have to be this way. "[The] President, [and the] U.S. government is way behind its public opinion," Mexico's former President points out. "And the legal public opinion, because of the referendum in California, 44 percent of Californians now accept, and are for legalizing for the use of marijuana. At national level, the last Gallup poll shows that 50 percent of public opinion, 50 percent of U.S. citizens agree to [marijuana being] legalized. So, the only one who sustains the prohibition, the criminalization, and the penalization of drug control is U.S. government, and it's totally incapable of enforcing the law.
"You have in the United States personalities like President Clinton," President Fox continued, "like President Obama, who also tried a drug once; if even it's once, it's a crime. Personalities, the Einstein of the 21st century, Steve Jobs, who in his book confessed that he used drugs for a period of ten years, so how come the nation that sustains, the government that insists in prohibition and criminalization is not capable of reducing consumption, and holding the drug on the border, and eliminated the cartels that openly operate in that nation?"
A good question, and one that the politicians who support prohibition in The United States cannot give an honest answer to. That's because the truth is that we know our policies won't reduce drug supply and consumption and our officials don't want people to stop using drugs. If everyone stopped using drugs then the drug war would not be profitable and there would no longer be a point.
And countries like Mexico can talk until they are blue in the face about legalization, but the sad reality is that The United States forces prohibition on many countries in exchange for monetary aid and other considerations. "Unfortunately we, very few remaining nations, that are still hold a total prohibition to the consumption of drugs, that is led by USA and just a few other nations. The majority of nations, including Mexico, we do not penalize consumption. In Mexico, in Portugal, in Spain, in most of Europe, using drugs, consuming drugs, it's not a crime, it's a crime to sell to distribute and to produce. So, the U.S. government holds the past. And it does not listen [to the] the voice of its own history."
In this way, Fox continues, "...you solve the problem of violence, and then you remain only with a health problem. This is what happened in Portugal, in Holland, and other nations, the Netherlands that has legalized the use of drugs.
"Prohibition [doesn't] work, let's move ahead, away from the paradigm, from the dogma. And let's put our feet to the ground. U.S. public opinion has already done that. I don't know why U.S. government is so narrow on this issue."
But is there any hope of change from newly reelected President Obama? Will he attempt the legalization path?